[TL;DR]
- Blockchain-based disaster relief systems reduce the traditional 3–7 day delay in international remittances to mere minutes, cut the 5–15% transaction fees to under 1%, and provide complete transparency throughout the donation process.
- WaaS (Wallet-as-a-Service) eliminates technical entry barriers by enabling anyone to send and receive aid using just an email address or social login, without the need to manage complicated crypto wallets.
- Real-world cases such as raising $50 million within 48 hours during the Ukraine war and the WFP's blockchain-based food aid in refugee camps demonstrate a new paradigm for disaster response.
1. Limitations and Problems of Traditional Disaster Relief Systems
1.1. Delays in the Complex International Remittance System
Whenever natural disasters or humanitarian crises occur worldwide, international solidarity and willingness to help gather swiftly. However, in reality, the actual delivery of funds to the affected areas takes significant time. This delay stems from the structural complexity of the current international remittance system.
Today's bank-to-bank transfers involve a complex web of intermediary institutions. For example, sending aid from Korea to the Philippines may involve a domestic bank, a correspondent bank, one or more intermediary banks, and the final recipient bank—typically at least 3–4 institutions. At each stage, compliance checks for anti-money laundering (AML) and counter-terrorist financing (CTF) consume additional time.
A further complication is that the current financial system operates only on business days. While disasters can occur at any moment, international remittances depend on the working days and hours of banks in each country. If a disaster occurs on a weekend or holiday, it might take several days before transfers can even begin. During year-end or extended holidays, delays may stretch beyond a week.
The SWIFT network faces similar issues. Although SWIFT messages are transmitted quickly, the actual settlement of funds is subject to the operational hours of central banks and national payment systems. As a result, even in emergencies, it takes 3–7 days on average—and sometimes more than two weeks—for relief funds to reach affected areas.
This delay is a critical flaw that can lead to missing the golden hour of disaster response. Just as the first 72 hours are crucial for rescuing survivors, the speed of early response in disaster relief is directly tied to saving lives. Unfortunately, this level of responsiveness is difficult to achieve under current systems.
1.2. High Fees and Exchange Losses
One of the most serious financial issues in international disaster relief is the excessive remittance fees and exchange losses. The current system consumes 5–15% of donation funds in fees that are unrelated to the actual aid.
Fee structures reveal a layered cost model: base fees charged by the sending bank, handling fees from intermediaries, and deposit fees from receiving banks. Added to this are foreign exchange margins applied at each stage, which further inflate the total cost.
Currency exchange losses are especially problematic. Most international transfers require conversion between sending and receiving currencies. Banks often apply disadvantageous rates, with differences of 2–4% from real market exchange rates, significantly reducing the actual value delivered to recipients.
These burdens are especially harsh for small donations. If someone sends 100,000 KRW (~$75), fixed fees alone can cost 10,000–20,000 KRW, severely reducing the final amount received. This discourages small donors and triggers a negative cycle that reduces overall support volume.
The profit model of intermediaries worsens the issue. Each institution adds fees to cover their operating costs and profits, escalating the total cost. Humanitarian aid is often subjected to the same fee structures as commercial transactions, undermining efficiency.
Such high-cost structures threaten the sustainability of international disaster relief. When donors realize that a large portion of their funds is lost to fees, their willingness to contribute diminishes—ultimately weakening global aid capacity.
1.3. Lack of Transparency and Trust
One of the most critical problems in current disaster relief systems is the lack of transparency in how funds are used. Donors often have no clear way of knowing how their money is spent, reducing overall trust in aid operations.
In traditional systems, donations pass through multiple intermediaries before reaching the beneficiaries. These may include international relief agencies, local partners, and regional distribution networks. Each deducts operational or administrative costs, which are rarely disclosed in detail. Some agencies use up to 30–50% of donations on overhead but fail to justify or explain these expenditures.
Accounting transparency is another challenge. While annual reports may provide high-level financial overviews, there is usually no disclosure of spending per disaster event. Donors are left in the dark about how effectively their contributions were used.
Uncertainty about how much money actually reaches victims is also a problem. As funds pass through institutions, various costs and losses shrink the amount delivered—sometimes to less than half of the original donation. But the scale and reasons for these losses are seldom shared publicly.
This lack of transparency fosters donor distrust. Surveys show that the biggest concern among donors is that their money won’t be used properly. Younger donors especially value traceability and openness, and appealing to them requires a fundamentally different approach.
1.4. Accessibility and Financial Exclusion in Disaster Areas
Disasters often damage or paralyze traditional financial infrastructure. In such cases, aid methods that rely on existing financial systems face serious limitations.
Natural disasters can destroy bank branches or cut off access due to power outages and communication breakdowns. For instance, after the 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake, many branches in Fukushima and Miyagi were wiped out by tsunamis, leaving survivors unable to access their accounts. Similarly, Typhoon Haiyan in the Philippines (2013) caused widespread financial infrastructure collapse that severely delayed aid delivery.
In remote or underdeveloped regions, access to financial services is limited even in normal times. In many parts of rural Africa and Asia, people must travel dozens of kilometers to reach the nearest bank. Disasters further compromise transportation, worsening the accessibility issue.
Lost identification documents cause especially acute exclusion. Most financial services require ID verification. After disasters, many victims lose their ID cards or passports. Getting replacements often requires help from government offices, which may also be inoperative.
A more fundamental issue is that a large portion of the global population is unbanked. According to the World Bank, 1.7 billion adults—31% of the world’s population—do not have bank accounts. These are often low-income individuals, rural residents, women, and young people—precisely the most vulnerable in times of disaster. The current system structurally cannot support them.
Linguistic and cultural barriers also play a role. Relief systems from international agencies are typically designed in English or other major global languages and often fail to reflect local languages or customs. This leaves people who most need aid unable to understand or access it.
2. How Blockchain Transforms Disaster Relief
2.1. Instant Transfers: 24/7 Global Accessibility
Blockchain fundamentally solves the issue of "time"—the most critical element in disaster relief. It bypasses the traditional layers and limitations of the financial system, allowing aid to be sent anywhere in the world within minutes.
Blockchain networks are decentralized and operate 24/7, powered by distributed nodes across the globe. Major networks like Ethereum and Polygon process transactions year-round—including holidays. Aid can be collected and distributed even at midnight on a weekend.
Transaction speeds are drastically faster than legacy systems. Ethereum confirms transfers in ~15 seconds, while faster chains like Polygon or Binance Smart Chain complete them in 2–3 seconds. Sending aid from Korea to earthquake victims in Indonesia—previously a 3-day process—can now be done in under a minute.
Smart contracts enable fully automated and programmable relief distribution. Funds can be instantly dispatched when specific criteria are met, preventing human error or system bottlenecks. For example, a smart contract can be programmed to release emergency funds automatically when a magnitude 7.0 earthquake is detected.
Cross-chain advances also make it easier to move assets between different blockchain networks. Bitcoin donations can be routed to Ethereum-based relief programs, and support distributed across chains can be centrally managed—ensuring donors can give in their preferred cryptocurrency without losing efficiency.
Layer 2 solutions offer even faster and cheaper transactions. In theory, L2s can process thousands of transactions per second, allowing large-scale responses to global disasters without network congestion. This scalability is vital in high-visibility emergencies.
2.2. Near-Zero Remittance Costs
A standout advantage of blockchain-based disaster relief is its remarkably low cost compared to traditional systems. The 5–15% fees of traditional remittance systems can be reduced to under 1%, allowing more aid to reach actual victims.
Blockchain transaction costs are limited to network (gas) fees. There are no intermediary fees, conversion charges, or processing costs. On Ethereum mainnet, international transfers typically cost $5–30—regardless of the amount being sent.
Using Layer 2 solutions reduces costs even further. On Polygon, fees are often under $0.01. On Arbitrum or Optimism, global transfers cost just a few cents. Whether sending $100 or $10,000, the fee remains the same—enabling small-scale donors to participate freely.
Exchange losses are also minimized through the use of stablecoins. Stablecoins like USDC and USDT are pegged 1:1 to fiat currencies like the USD, reducing exchange rate risk. These assets are backed by real-world reserves, offering security and eliminating the 2–4% losses typical in bank currency conversions.
Decentralized exchanges (DEXs) provide flexibility to swap tokens as needed. Platforms like Uniswap and PancakeSwap offer token swaps at low fees (0.25–0.3%), which is about one-tenth the cost of traditional bank currency exchange.
Batch transactions allow for mass disbursements. One transaction can deliver funds to hundreds of recipients, dramatically reducing per-recipient fees. Instead of incurring 1,000 fees for 1,000 transfers, a single blockchain batch transaction does it all.
These savings boost the scale and efficiency of disaster relief. Funds once lost to fees now go directly to those in need. More people can be supported with the same budget, and micro-donations become viable again—opening the door for broader participation in global aid.
2.3. Radical Transparency: Every Step Made Visible
One of the most transformative features of blockchain is that every transaction is permanently recorded on a public ledger, making it verifiable by anyone. This addresses one of the biggest flaws in traditional disaster relief: lack of transparency.
Every blockchain transaction can be tracked in real time using block explorers like Etherscan or BSCScan. Anyone can trace the full transaction history of a wallet address, including amounts, timestamps, and transaction fees. A donor can see exactly when their $10 donation was sent, where it went, and how much was deducted.
Using smart contracts for automated fund distribution enhances transparency even more. The rules for how funds are allocated are written into code and stored immutably on the blockchain. For instance, if a contract specifies that 90% of donations go to victims, 5% to operations, and 5% to an emergency reserve, it becomes technically impossible to use funds outside those parameters.
Multi-signature (multisig) wallets add another layer of security and oversight. They require approvals from multiple parties before funds can be spent. All approval activity is logged on the blockchain, clearly identifying who authorized each transaction and when.
Issuing NFTs as proof of donation is an innovative method for increasing transparency. Each donor receives a unique NFT that records their contribution permanently and can be updated to reflect how the funds were used. Donors can use their NFT to track the ongoing impact of their gift.
DAO-based governance makes the entire decision-making process open and community-driven. Key funding decisions are made via public votes, and all results are recorded on-chain. This ensures democratic transparency in prioritizing relief efforts and allocating resources.
Open-sourcing the platform's code further bolsters trust. Publishing smart contracts on GitHub allows the public to audit the code, verify the absence of malicious features, and identify any technical flaws—reinforcing the integrity of the relief system.
2.4. Financial Inclusion: An Accessible System for Everyone
Blockchain-based disaster relief systems offer unprecedented financial inclusivity, enabling people traditionally excluded from banking systems to access aid. Even without a bank account, credit history, or valid ID—so long as a person has a smartphone—they can receive support.
Crypto wallets serve as alternatives to traditional bank accounts. Installing a wallet app like MetaMask on a smartphone effectively creates a financial account usable anywhere in the world. There’s no paperwork, credit checks, or minimum deposits required. Anyone can create a wallet within minutes.
QR code–based disbursement systems drastically lower technical barriers. Instead of typing complex wallet addresses, users can simply scan a QR code to receive funds. This intuitive interface makes aid accessible even to the illiterate or elderly who are unfamiliar with digital devices.
Offline transaction features make it possible to deliver aid even in areas with unstable or nonexistent internet access. Bluetooth or NFC-based peer-to-peer transfers, satellite-powered blockchain access, and SMS-enabled transactions can all facilitate fund transfers in completely disconnected environments.
Multilingual support and localized user interfaces help break down language barriers. Major platforms use AI-powered translations in dozens of languages and adapt UI/UX designs to local cultural contexts. Features like visual icons or audio guides allow illiterate or visually impaired users to navigate systems with ease.
The cost-effectiveness of micro-aid is also dramatically improved. Previously, $1 or $5 donations were unfeasible due to fixed banking fees, but on the blockchain, such contributions can now make a meaningful impact—encouraging wider global participation in disaster relief efforts.
Community-based support networks are now feasible. Donors and recipients can be directly connected without going through large traditional relief agencies. Real-time updates, peer feedback, and social media integration enable more personal, efficient, and responsive relief flows.
3. Global Case Studies of Blockchain-Based Disaster Relief
3.1. The Ukraine War: A Real-World Proof of Crypto Relief
On February 24, 2022, Russia’s invasion of Ukraine became a historic case that demonstrated how blockchain-based relief systems could function effectively during real crises. Within just 48 hours of the war’s outbreak, over $50 million in cryptocurrency was raised globally to support Ukraine—far outpacing the response speed of traditional aid systems.
Immediately after the invasion, the Ukrainian government published official Bitcoin and Ethereum wallet addresses on its Twitter account—marking the first time a government formally requested emergency support via cryptocurrency. As conventional financial channels were at risk of disruption or censorship, blockchain provided a censorship-resistant and accessible alternative.
The volume and speed of fundraising were astonishing. Over $100 million in crypto donations were sent to Ukraine-related addresses during the first week alone, with hundreds of thousands of individual donations ranging from $1 to over $1 million. Every transaction was transparently recorded on-chain.
Ukrainian government agencies and affiliated organizations made effective use of the crypto funds. Some were converted immediately into local currency to purchase medical supplies and food; others were used to procure military gear abroad. Blockchain’s global reach enabled timely procurement despite sanctions and banking restrictions.
Civil society also mobilized quickly. NGOs like “Come Back Alive” raised tens of millions of dollars through their own crypto wallets, publishing all spending records in real time. Donors could verify how their funds were used via blockchain explorers.
Innovative fundraising efforts using NFTs also drew attention. The Ukrainian government launched the “Meta History: Museum of War” NFT collection to generate more funding. Independent artists created and sold NFTs to support Ukraine, showcasing a new form of solidarity beyond conventional charity.
This case clearly proved that cryptocurrency is not merely a speculative asset but a powerful tool for humanitarian aid—capable of operating without interruption, even under extreme geopolitical pressure.
3.2. Blockchain in Natural Disaster Response
Blockchain-based disaster relief has shown strong results not only in warzones but also in natural disaster situations—such as typhoons, earthquakes, and floods—highlighting its distinct advantages over legacy systems.
The 2020 Beirut port explosion in Lebanon was a key example in the Middle East. Within days of the incident, the global Lebanese diaspora began organizing crypto donations in Bitcoin and Ethereum. Amid Lebanon’s financial collapse and bank closures, crypto emerged as the only reliable means of international transfer.
Local NGOs began accepting crypto and gained donor trust by transparently disclosing their expenditures. Social media helped rapidly spread grassroots fundraising campaigns, particularly among younger Lebanese abroad, and aid was delivered much faster than through traditional institutions.
In Asia, the 2022 Pakistan floods presented another notable example. Despite the unclear stance of the Pakistani government on cryptocurrency, local civil society groups launched blockchain-based aid initiatives. Overseas Pakistanis used crypto to help their communities, avoiding the high costs of traditional remittance services.
Common traits emerged from these cases:
- Speed: Fundraising and distribution occurred within 24–48 hours, dramatically faster than legacy systems.
- Micro-donation activation: $10 or $20 gifts, once impractical due to fees, became feasible and impactful.
- Diaspora engagement: Migrant communities used crypto to respond swiftly and directly to disasters in their home countries.
- Transparency pressure: Donors valued real-time tracking of their donations, pushing traditional institutions to improve accountability.
3.3. Blockchain Adoption Among Traditional Relief Organizations
Major international relief organizations have also begun adopting blockchain technology through pilot projects, recognizing its long-term potential. Institutions like the UN, ICRC, and Oxfam are experimenting with blockchain and have even integrated it into some ongoing programs.
The World Food Programme (WFP) leads the way with its Building Blocks project, which began in 2017. In Jordan’s Syrian refugee camps, WFP implemented a blockchain-based food aid system. Refugees use digital identities stored on blockchain to purchase food, with all transactions transparently logged.
The key strength of this system is its ability to deliver aid directly—without intermediaries. It eliminates fraud and misuse common in cash and voucher systems. By combining blockchain with biometric ID, even undocumented refugees can safely receive support.
Oxfam tested a blockchain-based cash distribution program in Vanuatu. Cyclone-affected residents were given digital tokens instead of cash, redeemable at local stores. The system minimized security risks associated with cash handling and supported the local economy.
UNICEF now accepts crypto donations through its CryptoFund, which holds assets without converting them to fiat immediately. These funds are directly invested in blockchain-related projects, reducing conversion fees and contributing to ecosystem growth.
The World Bank is developing blockchain-based parametric insurance. Through smart contracts linked to weather data, payouts are triggered automatically when specific disaster criteria are met—bypassing traditional claims processing and delivering funds instantly.
Despite progress, several challenges remain:
- Regulatory uncertainty: Many countries lack clear crypto regulations, making full-scale adoption difficult.
- Infrastructure limitations: Internet access, smartphone availability, and digital literacy are still uneven in disaster areas.
- Institutional inertia: Long-established aid agencies often resist change. Overcoming this requires proven pilot results and staff training.
Nonetheless, momentum is building. The COVID-19 pandemic and Ukraine war exposed the limits of conventional systems and accelerated demand for better solutions. Major organizations now view blockchain not just as an experiment but as a foundational part of the future humanitarian infrastructure.
4. WaaS: Core Infrastructure for Mainstreaming Disaster Relief
4.1. Technical Barriers Still Remain
Despite the significant advantages of blockchain-based disaster relief systems, the general public still faces considerable technical barriers to actual use. These challenges are among the biggest obstacles to the mainstream adoption of blockchain and the expansion of relief systems.
The core issue is that creating and managing a crypto wallet is still too complex for average users. While installing a wallet like MetaMask is simple, proper usage requires understanding seed phrase backups, private key management, and network configuration. For many unfamiliar with digital tools, storing a 12- or 24-word seed phrase safely is daunting.
Losing a private key poses an even more serious risk. Unlike traditional banks where lost credentials can be recovered through ID verification, in blockchain systems, losing your private key or seed phrase means losing access to your assets permanently. This irreversible nature creates fear among potential users.
Security management is another major hurdle. Users are entirely responsible for wallet security and must defend against phishing, malicious apps, and fake wallets. If they fall victim to hacks or scams, there is no central authority to restore lost funds—demanding a high level of awareness and technical understanding.
Lack of understanding about gas fees and network costs can also cause confusion. On Ethereum, gas fees vary significantly depending on network congestion. Without proper gas settings, transactions may fail or incur excessive fees. The concept of “gas” itself is unfamiliar to most users.
Users also need to grasp differences between blockchain networks and token standards. Bitcoin, Ethereum, BNB Chain, and Polygon all use different wallet address formats and transfer mechanisms. Mistakes in choosing the correct network can lead to permanent asset loss. Understanding token standards like ERC-20 or BEP-20 adds another layer of complexity.
These technical learning curves are especially burdensome in disaster scenarios. Victims under extreme stress cannot be expected to learn complicated systems. For the elderly or digitally underserved, even acquiring new skills in normal times is difficult—let alone during emergencies.
Internet access and smartphone usage are also prerequisites. Most crypto wallets are smartphone apps and require stable internet connections. However, disaster zones often suffer from network outages, and some regions still have low smartphone penetration or limited digital literacy.
4.2. The Role of WaaS: Seamless Fund Transfers for Everyone
Wallet-as-a-Service (WaaS) is the essential infrastructure that eliminates these technical entry barriers, enabling the public to use blockchain technology with ease. WaaS handles all the backend complexity and presents a user-friendly interface that resembles traditional financial services.
The most groundbreaking feature is that users can receive donations simply by providing their email address. Without installing a wallet or managing seed phrases, individuals can access their funds after email verification. WaaS platforms automatically create and manage wallets in the background—making disaster fund access even simpler than opening a bank account.
Social login functionality further enhances accessibility. People can access their wallets using familiar accounts like Google, Facebook, or KakaoTalk—removing the need for new account creation or complicated authentication. This is especially intuitive for younger generations and social media-savvy users.
Simplifying wallet management is a core value of WaaS. All technical complexity, including key generation, backup, and security, is handled by the platform. Security is preserved using technologies like multi-signature approval and key sharding, while user experience is enhanced with biometric login or PIN authentication.
Auto-conversion between fiat and crypto drastically improves the user experience. Donors can give in familiar currencies like USD or KRW, while recipients receive funds in their preferred format. WaaS platforms handle real-time exchange rates on the backend. They can also connect with local payment rails to convert crypto into cash or mobile payments instantly.
Intuitive mobile apps with one-touch donation functionality lower the barrier to entry. Just like KakaoPay or PayPal, users can complete donations with a few taps—or by scanning a QR code or clicking a link. Options for recurring donations build sustainable support systems. Real-time display of exchange rates, fees, and estimated delivery times improves trust in the process.
4.3. Emergency Optimization Features
To address the unique characteristics of disaster relief, WaaS platforms can integrate special functions beyond standard financial services—enabling fast and effective support during emergencies. These emergency-optimized features could become key elements in revolutionizing future disaster response.
An “emergency mode” that activates automatically upon disaster detection is one of the most innovative features that WaaS could offer. By using AI and big data analytics to detect natural disasters (earthquakes, typhoons, floods) or human crises (wars, terror), the system could switch to emergency mode for affected regions. This might involve simplifying authentication, temporarily increasing transfer limits, or waiving/reducing transaction fees.
Message-based transfer systems that work offline would be especially useful in disaster zones with damaged communication infrastructure. A simple SMS-based transaction function could enable aid delivery without internet. Technologies like satellite connectivity and mesh networks are also under development to enable blockchain access in isolated areas.
Bluetooth or NFC-based peer-to-peer (P2P) transactions are another expected offline feature. With these, users could exchange crypto funds in close proximity without an internet connection. Once reconnected, the transactions would sync to the blockchain. Such functionality could be crucial for transferring funds between relief workers and victims, or for purchases at local shops in disaster zones.
Multilingual and localized interfaces must be implemented to ensure accessibility. In addition to major world languages, minority and regional dialects should be supported. The interface should use visual symbols and color codes for those who cannot read, and offer voice guidance for the visually impaired or illiterate. Inclusive UI/UX is a critical design priority.
A batch processing system for large-scale fund disbursement would drastically improve efficiency. In major disasters affecting tens of thousands of victims, sending funds individually is too time-consuming and expensive. With batch processing, a single transaction can deliver funds to thousands simultaneously—saving time and lowering network fees.
Smart contract–based automated allocation is also a promising tool for batch systems. By programming recipient lists, damage levels, and support criteria into the contract, the system can calculate and distribute funds fairly and without human error. This would enable uninterrupted 24/7 distribution even in the most chaotic conditions.
4.4. Compliance and Security Assurance
For WaaS to be widely adopted in disaster relief, it must comply with financial regulations and guarantee a high level of security. This is as essential as technical innovation—it’s the foundation for earning the trust of governments and international institutions.
Compliance with Anti-Money Laundering (AML) and Counter-Terrorism Financing (CTF) laws is the minimum requirement. WaaS platforms must monitor suspicious transaction patterns in real time and automatically report transfers exceeding defined thresholds. AI-powered anomaly detection systems can distinguish between legitimate aid and illegal activity, halting questionable transactions promptly.
All transaction data must be transparently recorded on-chain, enabling permanent audit trails that can be shared with authorities if needed. At the same time, compliance with privacy regulations such as GDPR is crucial. To balance transparency and privacy, advanced techniques like zero-knowledge proofs (ZKPs) can be used to validate transactions without revealing user identities.
Simplified KYC (Know Your Customer) procedures tailored for disaster contexts are critical. Traditional identity verification may not be feasible when victims have lost personal documents. WaaS platforms can use alternatives like biometric recognition, social media account verification, or community-based endorsements.
A tiered KYC approach allows for basic identity checks to unlock limited funding in emergencies, with expanded access granted after additional verification. This strikes a practical balance between urgent aid and regulatory compliance.
Enterprise-grade security systems must be in place to protect user assets and personal data. This includes multisig wallets, hardware security modules (HSMs), and cold storage strategies. Regular security audits and penetration testing are essential to identify and fix vulnerabilities proactively.
Integrating insurance coverage offers added protection. WaaS platforms should offer insurance for asset losses caused by hacks or system failures—and potentially even user mistakes—to build trust and reduce perceived risk.
Finally, close collaboration with regulatory bodies and international organizations ensures long-term viability and scalability. WaaS providers should work with national regulators, central banks, and disaster management agencies to create “regulatory sandboxes” for innovation. Partnerships with institutions like the UN, World Bank, and IMF can help establish global standards and interoperability.
Data governance and privacy must also be taken seriously. In compliance with global privacy laws, platforms should follow principles like user consent management, minimal data collection, and strict limits on data use. Users must always have the right to access or delete their personal data.
5. The Future of the Global Disaster Recovery Ecosystem
Blockchain-based disaster relief systems centered around WaaS are not just upgrades to existing models—they represent the foundation for an entirely new global disaster response ecosystem. By 2030, we may see AI instantly assess the scale of a disaster the moment it occurs, calculate required funding in real time, and alert global donors through a unified platform. From individuals to governments and international institutions, all actors could collaborate within this ecosystem to raise billions of dollars and deliver aid to affected regions within hours.
Future disaster relief will shift toward a personalized experience. For example, an office worker in Korea could choose to directly support a specific earthquake-affected family in Indonesia—and monitor in real time what they purchased with the donation and how they are rebuilding their lives. This goes beyond one-time charity and evolves into a long-term relationship built on solidarity, fostering a new form of global civil society.
Moreover, blockchain will evolve from an emergency tool to an integrated platform for long-term recovery and development. From immediate emergency relief to infrastructure rebuilding, education facility restoration, local economic revitalization, and job creation—every phase can be connected within a single ecosystem. Transparent funding mechanisms and smart contract–driven performance tracking will allow 10- or 20-year recovery projects to operate efficiently and be accountable to the public.
This future is already taking shape. The rapid $100 million raised within 48 hours during the Ukraine war, the WFP’s blockchain-based aid for over a million refugees, and Oxfam’s blockchain innovation in Vanuatu are all early signals of what's to come. If WaaS helps to mainstream and normalize this innovation, disaster relief will no longer be a symbol of despair and helplessness. Instead, it will become a collective opportunity for global unity and hope—powered by blockchain.
[WEPIN Wallet SNS Channels]
