Accessibility as the Core Engine of Mass Adoption: Analyzing the APAC Crypto Market

[TL;DR]

• APAC accounts for 75% of all global crypto users, but the gap between 95% awareness and 25% actual usage is the biggest obstacle to further growth.
• Stablecoins (370 million users), remittances, and RWAs have proven their practicality, yet 47% of people still feel crypto is hard to access, showing the urgency of infrastructure improvement.
• The fact that 66% want regulation and 59% demand integration with traditional finance shows that users prioritize trust and convenience over pure innovation.
  ‍

1. APAC Is Leading the Global Digital Asset Market

1.1 Over 500 Million Users, 75% of Global Crypto Owners

The Asia-Pacific (APAC) region is the epicenter of the digital asset market. As of 2025, 24.3% of internet-connected adults in APAC own or use cryptocurrencies, amounting to roughly 535 million people. The fact that 74.6% of global crypto users are concentrated in this region shows that APAC is not just a “large market” but is effectively leading the global digital asset ecosystem in practice.

This figure is up 1.9 percentage points from the previous year, confirming that the APAC market continues to grow. However, the nature of this growth has changed. In the early days, the crypto market expanded driven by the rising price of Bitcoin or general curiosity around blockchain technology. Today, however, it is actual user experience and convenience that drive adoption. People no longer see crypto as just a speculative asset.

The drivers of adoption have clearly shifted. Practical needs such as cost reduction, greater control, and expanded opportunities are what pull users into digital assets. Rather than ideology or beliefs, usability, integration, and inclusiveness are becoming the new growth engines. This means digital assets are starting to be integrated into everyday financial activities.

However, there is still a large gap between the fact that 95% of adults are aware of crypto and the actual usage rate. The gap between awareness and adoption reveals the critical challenge that must be addressed for the market to move into its next phase. People know what crypto is, but they still have not found clear answers to why they should use it or how to use it.
‍

1.2 Emerging Markets vs. Advanced Economies: A Split Between Utility and Investment

Even within APAC, the primary reasons for adoption vary dramatically depending on the stage of economic development. In emerging markets, the crypto adoption rate is 33%, higher than the 25% seen in advanced economies. This is not simply a difference in numbers; the purpose of use itself diverges. In emerging markets such as Thailand, India, and the Philippines, crypto is perceived as a practical financial tool.

In these countries, crypto is used for remittances, payments, and as a hedge against inflation. In Thailand, for example, 38% of adults use crypto, a very high adoption rate, because crypto compensates for the constraints and inefficiencies of the existing financial system. When cross-border remittance costs are high, banking access is limited, or domestic currency is highly volatile, digital assets become a realistic alternative.

On the other hand, in advanced economies such as Japan, Korea, Australia, and Singapore, the main purposes are investment and portfolio diversification. Users in these countries already have access to stable financial infrastructure, so they see crypto less as a replacement for the existing system and more as one leg of their asset allocation. Japan has the lowest adoption in APAC at 8%, backed by a conservative investment culture and the relative stability of the yen. That said, recent easing of stablecoin regulations is signaling a shift.

The speed at which digital assets spread depends on how naturally they mesh with existing financial habits. In emerging markets, adoption takes place in a way that fills the gaps of the current system; in advanced economies, it occurs in a way that supplements the system. These are different paths, but both are rooted in users’ real, everyday needs.
‍

1.3 Changing User Profiles: From Young Males to the General Public

The early crypto market was dominated by young men. People with higher technical literacy, greater risk tolerance, and a strong appetite for new investment opportunities drove the market. But by 2025, the APAC market is no longer confined to a particular demographic group. The share of female users has increased from 20% to 22%, and participation among the 45–54 age group has also exceeded 20%.

This shift is a clear signal that digital assets are becoming more mainstream. It means that crypto has moved beyond the domain of tech enthusiasts and is being utilized by general consumers in everyday financial activity. The rising participation of women and middle-aged users indicates that the market is entering a more mature stage. These users focus more on practicality than speculation, and prefer stable, easy-to-understand services.

The diversification of the user base generates new demands in the market. Early adopters may have tolerated complex wallet setups and technical jargon, but mass-market users do not. They expect a level of convenience and intuitiveness similar to existing financial services. Interfaces must be simple, terminology must be clear, and there must be a robust customer support system they can turn to when something goes wrong.

This shift in user profiles is changing the direction of the entire market. As the market moves from technology-centric to user-centric, and from speculation-centric to utility-centric, who participates increasingly determines what succeeds. The 500 million users in APAC are no longer early adopters; they are mainstream consumers. What they want is not complex technology, but financial services that work seamlessly in their daily lives.
‍

2. The Accessibility Gap: The Real Bottleneck to Market Growth

2.1 95% Awareness, 25% Usage – The Gap Between Knowing and Using

95% of adults in APAC are aware of cryptocurrencies. This is a remarkable figure, showing that digital assets are no longer a niche topic for tech enthusiasts but have achieved broad public awareness. However, the actual usage rate is only 24.3%. There is a gap of more than 70 percentage points between awareness and usage. This gap highlights the single biggest obstacle to growth facing the market.

People know what crypto is. They see it in the news, hear about it from friends, and encounter it in advertising. But knowing something exists is completely different from actually using it. High awareness means the market has moved beyond the early stage, but low usage means something is still holding people back.

This is often described as the conversion gap. The key to the next stage of growth lies in understanding why the 70% who know about digital assets still do not start using them. While concerns about price volatility, fears about security, complex usage procedures, or regulatory uncertainty all play a role, the most fundamental issue is that access feels difficult.

Traditional financial services allow users to start using them immediately once they open a bank account. You download an app, pass identity verification, deposit money, and you are ready to go. Crypto, however, is different. You have to create a wallet, write down a 12- or 24-word seed phrase, sign up for an exchange, and go through an on-ramp process. Many people give up at some point along this journey. The reason they know about crypto but do not use it is simple: it feels too complicated.
‍

2.2 The Signal Behind “I Would Use It If It Were Easier” – 63% of Non-Users

The conversion gap is not just a problem; it also reveals a major opportunity. Among those who currently do not use crypto, 63% say that they would “start using it if it became easier to use.” In emerging markets, this proportion is even higher. These people are not hostile or indifferent to digital assets. They simply feel that the barrier to entry is too high.

This 63% represents the potential market that can be unlocked through improved accessibility. If we improve usability, simplify interfaces, strengthen education, and provide trustworthy services, these people are ready to enter the market. This suggests that APAC still has huge room for growth and that future growth will come not from new technology but from enhancements in accessibility.

In other words, beyond the current 535 million active users, there are hundreds of millions more potential participants. They do not need to be persuaded; they need a clear path. They already understand that crypto can be useful—that it can reduce remittance fees, enable faster payments, and protect assets from inflation. The problem is not the “why,” but the “how.”

In conclusion, expanding accessibility means more than just increasing user numbers. As more people join, network effects strengthen, the ecosystem matures, and use cases diversify. If the 63% of potential users actually enter the market, the APAC digital asset market could more than double in size. The key to bringing them in is not technology—it is experience.
‍

2.3 The Four Dimensions of Accessibility: Reach, Ease, Fit, and Trust

Accessibility is not a single concept. The report breaks it down into four dimensions: reach, ease, fit, and trust. All four must be satisfied for people to start using digital assets in practice. If even one is lacking, the conversion gap will not close.

Reach is about whether services are physically and technically accessible. It asks whether there is internet connectivity, whether users have smartphones, and whether exchanges or wallet services operate in the relevant country. In most parts of APAC, reach has been largely addressed: mobile internet penetration is high and major exchanges offer services. But in some countries and regions, reach is still limited by regulation or infrastructure.

Ease is about how simple the service is to use. Complex wallet setups, hard-to-understand terminology, and cumbersome KYC procedures all degrade ease of use. Most digital asset services are currently designed on the assumption that the user has some technical background. For the general public, they are simply too difficult. Mass adoption is only possible when ease reaches the level of traditional financial services.

Fit is about whether the service actually matches the user’s real needs. People who need remittances require cheap, fast transfer services. Those worried about inflation need a stable store of value. Investors prioritize diverse asset choices and liquidity. Without fit, people see no reason to use the product. Digital assets must offer clear advantages over existing financial services.

Trust is about whether users feel safe entrusting their assets to the service. Security, regulatory compliance, customer support, and dispute resolution mechanisms all contribute to trust. Many people avoid digital assets simply because they do not trust them. News about hacks, exchange bankruptcies, and scams undermines confidence. Trust is not built overnight and requires robust regulatory and institutional protection.
‍

2.4 Removing the Bottleneck as the Condition for the Next Growth Phase

The accessibility gap accurately reflects where the market stands today. The APAC digital asset market has moved beyond the initial stage. Awareness is high. The technology works. Use cases have been proven. Yet growth is stuck on the threshold of mass adoption. If this bottleneck is not removed, the market will inevitably plateau at its current level.

The next 500 million users must be acquired differently from the first 500 million. Early adopters were drawn by curiosity about the technology or the lure of investment returns, willingly enduring complex processes. Mass-market users are not like that. They demand convenience, stability, and clear value. If the market fails to adapt to these expectations, growth will stall.

Improving accessibility is not merely a matter of polishing UX. It is a comprehensive task that involves building infrastructure, defining regulations, providing education, and earning trust. The good news is that the industry recognizes this. WaaS (Wallet-as-a-Service), simplified on- and off-ramps, compliance platforms, and integration with traditional finance are all concrete attempts to resolve these issues.

Ultimately, closing the accessibility gap will determine the next chapter of growth in the APAC digital asset market. The 63% of potential users are already waiting. The only question is whether the market will move towards them, or leave them hesitating on the sidelines. After 2025, the winners will not necessarily be those with the most advanced technology, but those who provide the easiest access.
‍

3. The Infrastructure That Makes Accessibility Possible

3.1 Complexity as the Entry Barrier

The first thing someone faces when trying to start using digital assets is the wallet. To create a wallet, you download an app, write down 12 or 24 seed words on paper, and store them somewhere safe. A warning appears saying that if you lose this seed phrase, your assets will be lost forever. Many people feel anxiety at this stage. The fear that “one mistake could cost real money” discourages them from getting started.

Even after creating a wallet, the process is not over. To actually use crypto, users must sign up for an exchange, complete identity verification, and link a bank account to convert fiat into crypto. This process is called on-ramping, and users often have no clear idea how much fees will be, how long it will take, or how safe it is. To someone new, the entire journey feels like a maze.

This level of complexity does not exist in traditional finance. You open a banking app, log in with a simple authentication method, and send money by entering an account number. If you forget your password, you can reset it, and if something goes wrong, you can call customer support. In digital assets, by contrast, the user bears all the responsibility. This difference is a key reason behind the accessibility gap.

To improve accessibility, this complexity must be removed. Technically, it is already possible, but to implement it in practice, we need a new infrastructure layer. Users should not need to understand how a blockchain works; they should be able to use digital assets as naturally as sending an email. This is precisely the problem WaaS aims to solve.
‍

3.2 WaaS: Taking on the Complexity on Behalf of Users

WaaS services hide the complexity of wallet creation and management in the backend. Users simply sign up with email or social login and access their accounts with a simple password or biometric authentication. There is no need to remember or write down a seed phrase. The service provider securely manages keys, and users access their accounts in familiar ways. Complexity moves into the background, and convenience comes to the front.

This approach may be criticized as departing from the philosophy of decentralization. If users do not hold their own keys, then it is not true self-custody, critics argue. But from the perspective of mass adoption, accessible services take priority over perfect self-sovereignty. Most people do not trust themselves to manage their own keys safely and prefer a trusted provider to do it for them.

In fact, 52% of respondents say they would store digital assets with a bank if possible. This indicates that people prefer protection by a trusted institution over complete self-sovereignty. WaaS responds to this demand. Service providers assume responsibility for key management while preserving the transparency and verifiability of blockchain.

As these services spread, the entry threshold for using digital assets will drop sharply. Creating a wallet goes from taking several minutes to just a few seconds, and users can simply remember a password without worrying about losing a seed phrase. If something goes wrong, they can contact customer support and recover their account. Users get a level of convenience similar to traditional financial services while still enjoying the benefits of blockchain.
‍

3.3 Building the Bridge Between Fiat and Crypto

Even after a wallet is created, users cannot actually use digital assets until they obtain some crypto. This requires converting fiat into crypto, a process known as on-ramping. Many users struggle with this step. Linking a bank account to an exchange, making a deposit, and placing a buy order are all unfamiliar tasks.

The reverse process—off-ramping—is no easier. Converting crypto back to fiat and withdrawing it to a bank account is also complicated. Fees are unclear, processing times vary, and procedures differ from platform to platform. When this process is not smooth, people are more likely to treat digital assets as speculative investments to hold, rather than something to use in everyday transactions.

To improve accessibility, on- and off-ramps must become frictionless. Users should be able to move between fiat and crypto with just a few clicks, with fees clearly shown and processing times short. Some services are addressing this by integrating directly with bank accounts or allowing users to buy crypto instantly with credit cards.

Some platforms go even further, enabling users to transact without consciously differentiating between fiat and crypto. Balances are displayed in local currency like KRW or USD, but are actually held and transacted as stablecoins under the hood. Users enjoy fast, low-cost payments and transfers without even realizing they are using crypto. This is the ultimate form of accessibility.
‍

3.4 Balancing Regulatory Compliance and User Experience

For digital asset services to reach the mass market, they must comply with regulations. KYC (Know Your Customer) and AML (Anti-Money Laundering) processes are mandatory, but they are also sources of friction in the user experience. Taking photos of IDs, recording selfies, and providing proof of address are all burdensome. However, ignoring regulations would render the service illegal or cause users to distrust it.

The problem is that regulatory compliance and convenience often appear to be in conflict. But technically, it is possible to satisfy both. With biometric authentication and AI-based identity verification, KYC can be completed in minutes. Blockchain transparency can be harnessed to automate AML monitoring. If compliance infrastructure is properly set up, users can feel safe without being overly inconvenienced.

Some countries are working with industry players to build standardized KYC systems. Under such systems, a user who has been verified once can reuse that verification across multiple services. This eliminates the need to redo KYC from scratch every time they sign up for a new exchange. Regulations become stricter, yet the user experience actually improves.

According to the report, 66% of adults in APAC believe that crypto regulation is necessary for consumer protection. Interestingly, current crypto users (77%) want regulation even more strongly than non-users (62%). This shows that regulation is not a barrier to adoption but instead functions as infrastructure for trust. With regulation, people can feel safer entrusting their assets to digital asset services.
‍

3.5 Turning Many Blockchains into One Seamless Experience

The digital asset ecosystem is fragmented across many blockchains. Bitcoin, Ethereum, Solana, Polygon, and others all require different wallets, interfaces, and fee structures. Users must track which asset lives on which chain, and use bridges to move between chains. For ordinary users, this complexity is overwhelming.

Cross-chain interoperability aims to solve this. Users manage assets on multiple chains from a single interface, and cross-chain transfers are handled automatically in the background. If someone holds Bitcoin but wants to use an Ethereum-based DeFi service, the app can execute the necessary operations without requiring the user to manually find and use a bridge. Users do not need to know what a blockchain is.

This abstraction is at the core of accessibility. Just as we do not need to understand TCP/IP to browse the web, users should not need to understand how blockchains work in order to use digital assets. Technology should run in the background, while users only experience the results—fast transactions, low fees, and safety.

Some platforms are already moving in this direction. They aggregate assets across chains into a single view, automatically route transactions through the optimal path, and present users with a simple interface. As such services proliferate, fragmentation becomes less of an issue. Users can manage all their digital assets from a single app.
‍

3.6 Infrastructure Shapes Experience

Accessibility is less a technology problem and more an infrastructure problem. Blockchains are already functioning. Stablecoins exist. Tokenized assets are being issued. What has been lacking is the layer that enables ordinary users to access and use all this easily. WaaS, on/off-ramps, compliance systems, and cross-chain interoperability together constitute that layer.

Once this infrastructure is in place, the user experience of digital assets changes fundamentally. Complex procedures disappear, anxiety diminishes, and trust increases. People stop perceiving digital assets as difficult and dangerous, and begin treating them as normal financial tools.

The fact that 63% of potential users in APAC say “I would use crypto if it were easier” shows that they are waiting for this infrastructure to mature. The next wave of growth will not come from entirely new technologies, but from delivering existing technologies better. Infrastructure shapes experience, and experience drives adoption. After 2025, the winner in digital assets will not necessarily be the fastest blockchain, but the service that offers the smoothest experience.
‍

4. Three Killer Use Cases

4.1 Stablecoins: Why 370 Million Users Have Chosen Them

17.0% of internet-connected adults in APAC use stablecoins, which translates to about 372 million people. Interestingly, adoption in emerging markets stands at 17.8%, nearly three times higher than the 5.8% seen in advanced economies. This gap indicates that stablecoins are not just investment products but functioning as practical financial tools.

Stablecoins combine the technological advantages of crypto with the stability of fiat currencies. Unlike Bitcoin, which can fluctuate by 10% or more in a single day, stablecoins can be transferred quickly and cheaply via blockchain while maintaining a stable value. This offers an entry point for people who have avoided crypto due to price volatility. In fact, positive sentiment toward stablecoins (52%) is higher than toward crypto as a whole (47%).

In emerging markets, stablecoins are used for three main purposes. The first is payments. When paying in local currency involves high FX fees or long settlement times, stablecoins offer a more efficient alternative. The second is remittances. Traditional cross-border remittances via banks are expensive and slow, whereas stablecoin transfers generally settle within minutes and at a fraction of the cost. The third is value storage. In countries suffering from high inflation, people turn to dollar-pegged stablecoins to protect their assets.

However, 47% of respondents still say stablecoins are difficult to access. This indicates that the infrastructure is not yet mature. Buying, holding, and using stablecoins is still a complex process. Users have to sign up for exchanges, create wallets, and go through on-ramp steps. As these barriers fall, the 370 million stablecoin users are likely to increase much faster.
‍

4.2 Real Value Revealed in Payments and Remittances

The most compelling use case for stablecoins is remittances. APAC accounts for 40% of global remittance inflows. 31% of adults in the region use remittance services, rising to 36.9% in emerging markets. In countries such as the Philippines, Vietnam, and Indonesia, remittances are not just a financial service—they are critical economic infrastructure.

Traditional remittance services are expensive. Western Union or bank-based remittances typically carry fees of 5–7%, sometimes exceeding 10%. Sending $100 can easily cost $10 in fees. Settlement times can stretch to several days. For people who remit frequently, these costs and delays are a heavy burden.

Stablecoins fundamentally change this. Already, 25% of remittance users leverage stablecoins for cross-border transfers. Fees can fall below 1%, and transactions are completed within minutes. Recipients can keep funds in stablecoins or convert them immediately into local currency. In terms of speed, cost, and convenience, stablecoin-based remittances outperform traditional remittance channels.

However, there is still a major challenge. While 61% of users find traditional remittance services “easy,” only 15% say the same about stablecoins. This gap is a usability problem. Traditional remittances can be as simple as going to a store, handing over cash, and receiving a code. The recipient visits a store, gives the code, and receives cash. In contrast, stablecoin remittances require wallet creation, address copying, and transaction confirmation. For mass adoption, the process must become as simple as traditional remittances.
‍

4.3 Hedging Inflation: An Alternative to Unstable Currencies

Another key use case for stablecoins is inflation hedging. In some APAC countries, local currencies are rapidly losing value. Annual inflation can exceed double digits. In such environments, people are reluctant to hold their savings in domestic currency, since purchasing power may fall by 10–20% in a single year.

Traditionally, people have turned to US dollars or gold to hedge against inflation. But holding physical dollars is not always easy, and gold is not suitable for small transactions. Opening foreign currency accounts often requires strict conditions, and cross-border transfers are restricted. As a result, many people have lacked access to reliable stores of value.

Stablecoins change this equation. Anyone with a smartphone can hold dollar-pegged stablecoins such as USDT or USDC. There is no minimum amount, no need for a bank account, and trading is available 24/7. People can quickly move into stablecoins when their local currency falls and convert back to local money when needed. This gives small savers a practical, accessible tool to hedge inflation.

Of course, stablecoins are not risk-free. There are concerns about the solvency of issuers, transparency of reserve assets, and regulatory risks. The collapse of TerraUSD demonstrated that not all stablecoins are truly “stable.” However, major stablecoins such as USDT and USDC have maintained stability over several years, and regulatory oversight is tightening. Many users trust these assets more than their own local currencies.
‍

4.4 Tokenized Real-World Assets: Lowering the Barrier to Ownership

The third killer use case for digital assets is tokenized real-world assets (RWAs). 14.8% of adults in APAC already invest in RWAs. While still in the early stages, this segment is growing rapidly. RWAs are real-world assets—such as real estate, stocks, bonds, or art—represented as tokens on a blockchain. Each token corresponds to a fractional share of the underlying asset.

The biggest advantage of tokenization is that it enables fractional ownership. A commercial building in Gangnam, Seoul, might be worth tens or hundreds of billions of KRW. It is impossible for an average individual to buy such an asset outright. But if the building is tokenized into thousands or millions of tokens, anyone can buy a small slice according to their budget. Even with 100,000 KRW, a user can own a portion of a Gangnam building.

The second advantage is liquidity. Assets like real estate or art are traditionally illiquid. Finding a buyer takes time, brokerage fees are high, and legal processes are complex. Tokenized assets, however, are traded on blockchains and can be bought or sold 24/7. The ability to quickly liquidate positions when needed is highly attractive to investors. According to the report, 37% of investors cite liquidity access as a key motivation for RWA investment.

The third advantage is borderless access. It is difficult for a Korean investor to directly buy U.S. real estate due to complex procedures and high minimum investment thresholds. Tokenized U.S. real estate, however, can be purchased with just a few clicks from Korea. As geographic barriers disappear, investment opportunities expand globally. 36% of investors highlight cross-border access as a core appeal of RWAs.
‍

4.5 High Interest, Low Access

Interest in RWAs is high. The most popular tokenized assets according to surveys are stocks (43%), residential real estate (40%), and commercial real estate (33%). People gravitate towards tokenization of assets they already understand. Rather than exotic new asset types, they want familiar ones—like stocks or property—to be tradable on-chain.

However, reality has not caught up with this level of interest. Only 13% of adults consider RWAs “easily accessible.” Infrastructure is underdeveloped, regulations are unclear, and there are relatively few trusted platforms. Tokenizing real assets requires complex legal processes to ensure that the underlying asset is properly owned, managed, and legally linked to the token.

From an investor’s perspective, uncertainty is significant. When buying a token, it is not always clear whether one obtains legally enforceable rights to the underlying asset, whether they will receive dividends or rental income, or who is responsible if something goes wrong. Without robust legal and institutional infrastructure, RWAs will remain a niche.

That said, there are signs of progress. Singapore, Hong Kong, and Japan are all refining regulatory frameworks for tokenized securities. Major asset managers are launching blockchain-based funds. As infrastructure matures, RWAs could become one of the fastest-growing sectors in digital assets—particularly given that the market size of real-world assets is several times larger than that of the crypto market itself.
‍

4.6 Utility Drives Adoption

Stablecoins, remittances, and RWAs share a common trait: they all solve real problems. Stablecoins address volatility and inflation; remittances tackle high fees and slow processing; RWAs resolve high entry barriers and low liquidity. People are not interested in blockchain technology per se; they are interested in the concrete benefits it brings.

This marks a maturation of the digital asset market. In the early days, curiosity about technology and speculative motives drove adoption. Now, clear use cases are required. If blockchain can reduce remittance fees by 10x, lower investment thresholds for real estate by 100x, or protect assets from inflation, people will use digital assets.

For the market to keep growing, more such killer use cases are needed. In gaming, social media, healthcare, supply chains, and beyond, blockchain must provide experiences that are clearly better than existing systems. Technical superiority alone is not enough. Users must be able to feel the value directly. The reason 370 million people have chosen stablecoins is simple: they are faster, cheaper, and safer.
‍

5. Regulation and Integration: The Two Pillars of Trust

5.1 Regulation as the Foundation of Trust, Not an Obstacle

The digital asset industry has long viewed regulation as a drag on growth. The dominant concern was that stricter rules would stifle innovation, limit user onboarding, and shrink the market. However, data from APAC tells a different story. 66% of respondents believe crypto regulation is necessary for consumer protection. Regulation is functioning not as a brake but as infrastructure for trust.

Even more interesting is that current crypto users (77%) are more in favor of regulation than non-users (62%). This runs counter to intuition; we might expect those directly regulated to resist regulation. But users who have actually interacted with digital assets feel the need for clear rules more acutely.

They have witnessed or experienced hacks, exchange collapses, and fraudulent projects. In an unregulated environment, consumers are exposed and unprotected. There is nowhere to appeal when things go wrong, and lost funds are effectively irrecoverable. Users prefer a safe market to a completely free one. Only with regulation can they entrust their assets with confidence.

Well-designed regulation does not shrink the market; it expands it. Clear rules allow businesses to operate without legal uncertainty, and users to participate knowing they are protected. Properly crafted regulatory frameworks can protect consumers without stifling innovation. Many APAC countries are working to strike this balance.
‍

5.2 Regulatory Developments in Singapore, Hong Kong, and Japan

APAC’s key financial hubs are building digital asset regulatory frameworks aligned with global standards. Singapore’s Monetary Authority (MAS) operates a clear licensing system. Digital asset exchanges and service providers must obtain MAS approval and meet stringent requirements around anti-money laundering, segregation of client funds, and cybersecurity. Although tough, this process gives licensed firms the stamp of regulatory credibility.

Hong Kong, led by the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC), has also built a comprehensive framework. It has introduced a licensing regime for virtual asset trading platforms, and opened the door for retail investors to trade crypto on regulated platforms. This illustrates a policy stance of providing safe access for the general public, not just institutions.

Japan takes a conservative yet systematic approach. Crypto exchanges must register with the Financial Services Agency (FSA), and a regulatory framework for stablecoins has recently been introduced. Japan’s policy is shaped by lessons from the Mt. Gox incident, with strong emphasis on consumer protection. As a result, growth may be slower, but trust is higher. Japanese investors strongly prefer engaging with digital assets only in regulated environments.

These countries adapt global recommendations—from the Financial Stability Board (FSB), IOSCO, and others—to their local context. Crucially, regulation here is about management, not prohibition. Instead of outlawing digital assets, they establish pathways for legal operation. Innovation continues within these frameworks.
‍

5.3 How Regulation Expands the Market

Clear regulation also paves the way for institutional investors. Banks, asset managers, and insurers cannot enter markets with legal uncertainty. They must meet stringent internal requirements on compliance, auditing, and risk management. As regulation clarifies the rules, a legal path opens for these institutions to participate.

Institutional participation changes the market in two ways. First, it increases liquidity. When billions of dollars flow into the market, trading volumes rise, volatility decreases, and the market stabilizes. Second, it pushes infrastructure standards higher. Institutions demand institutional-grade custody, trading systems, and risk tools. As such infrastructure is built, retail investors benefit as well.

Regulation also filters out illegal or fraudulent projects. In unregulated environments, anyone could issue a token and raise funds, with many failing to deliver on promises—and some being outright scams. Investors suffered large losses, eroding trust in the market as a whole. Setting minimum standards through regulation enables the ecosystem to weed out bad actors.

Of course, overregulation can backfire. Excessively strict rules may suppress innovation, raise costs, and shrink the market. But major APAC jurisdictions are striving for balance. They pursue both consumer protection and innovation, evolving their regulations through ongoing dialogue with the industry. Regulation is not static; it evolves with the market.
‍

5.4 The Blurring Boundary Between Traditional Finance and Digital Assets

Users do not see digital assets and traditional finance as separate worlds. They want the two systems to be seamlessly connected. According to the report, 59% of adults in APAC think it should be easier to move funds between digital assets and bank accounts. Today, users must deposit money into exchanges, buy crypto, and transfer it to wallets. This process needs to be simplified to just a few clicks.

Furthermore, 71% believe banks, regulators, and exchanges should cooperate more closely. Right now, these three players often move independently. Banks sometimes block transfers to exchanges; exchanges struggle to open bank accounts; regulators struggle to close the gap between the two. A truly integrated ecosystem requires coordination among all parties.

Users’ expectations are concrete. 60% expect that banks will eventually provide digital asset accounts or wallet services. They want to see Bitcoin or stablecoin balances alongside deposits, savings, and mutual funds in their banking apps. 52% say they would store digital assets with a bank if they could. This shows that users prefer access through trusted institutions.

Some banks are already moving. DBS in Singapore operates a digital exchange and offers crypto services to institutional clients. Certain Hong Kong banks are piloting crypto-related services. Retail services remain limited for now, but as regulations and infrastructure mature, they are likely to expand. When banks fully enter the digital asset space, mass adoption could accelerate significantly.
‍

5.5 Interoperability, Not Replacement

Digital assets originally aimed to replace traditional finance. Early Bitcoin communities envisioned a new financial system without central banks or commercial banks. But in reality, users do not seek outright replacement—they seek complementarity. They do not want to abandon the current system; they want a world where both systems coexist and interoperate.

This is a practical choice. Traditional finance is built on decades or centuries of accumulated infrastructure—bank accounts, credit cards, loans, insurance—all deeply embedded in daily life. It is neither realistic nor desirable to replace all of this overnight with digital assets. Users want to preserve what is familiar while adding new possibilities.

Interoperability makes this possible. Users should be able to move funds freely between bank accounts and stablecoin wallets, pay credit card bills with crypto, and use tokenized assets as collateral for bank loans. As the boundary between digital assets and traditional finance fades, users can choose the most suitable tool for each need.

Once this integration is achieved, digital assets will no longer feel “special.” Just as mobile banking was once innovative but is now taken for granted, digital assets will become a natural part of financial services. Users will enjoy faster, cheaper remittances, more diverse investment options, and greater financial control—without having to think about blockchain at all.
‍

5.6 Trust and Accessibility Together

Regulation and integration may seem like separate issues, but in reality, they serve the same goal: building trust and improving accessibility. Regulation creates legal and institutional trust; integration creates trust at the level of user experience. With regulation, people are confident their assets will not simply vanish; with integration, they are confident they can use services easily without facing excessive complexity.

The APAC market shows that these two pillars must grow together. With regulation but no integration, services may be safe but inconvenient. With integration but no regulation, they may be convenient but risky. Only when both are balanced can users enjoy safe and convenient experiences. This is the condition for bringing the next 500 million users into the market.

In the coming years, the fastest-growing digital asset services in APAC will be those that comply with regulations and integrate smoothly with traditional finance. Exchanges may acquire banking licenses, banks may launch digital asset services, or new hybrid institutions may emerge. Whatever the exact form, the core will be the same: the services that win will be those that users can trust and use easily.
‍

6. Conclusion: Accessibility Is the New Adoption

The APAC digital asset market stands at a turning point. With over 500 million users—75% of global crypto owners—this market is no longer in its infancy. The technology works. Use cases have been proven. Awareness stands at 95%. Yet growth has stalled. The 70-percentage-point gap between awareness and usage captures the current state of the market perfectly. To move to the next stage, this gap must be closed.

After 2025, the key differentiator will not be technology but experience. The winner will not be defined by the fastest blockchain, the most innovative consensus algorithm, or the lowest fees. Success will depend on how easily users can access services, how safely they can use them, and how naturally digital assets fit into their daily lives. Complex wallet setups, confusing jargon, shaky security, and inconvenient on/off-ramps will no longer be tolerated. To achieve mass adoption, crypto must be as easy as traditional finance.

Improving accessibility is not a single solution but a multi-layered effort. WaaS must hide complexity, on/off-ramps must erase the boundary between fiat and crypto, regulation must build trust, and integration with traditional finance must provide familiarity. Killer use cases such as stablecoins, remittances, and tokenized assets have already proven their utility. What we need now is infrastructure that makes these use cases accessible to everyone.

The 63% of potential users are already waiting. Their answer—“I would use crypto if it were easier”—clearly shows where the next growth will come from. They do not need to be persuaded about the usefulness of crypto; they are ready to start. The only remaining question is whether the market will move towards them or leave them hesitating. Accessibility is the new adoption. This is how the APAC digital asset market will welcome its next 500 million users.